Impacto de la movilidad poblacional en el comportamiento de virus respiratorios durante la pandemia COVID-19 / Impact of population mobility on the behavior of respira tory viruses during the COVID-19 pandemic

Resumen Introducción : Durante la pandemia de SARS-CoV-2 en Argentina se implementaron intervenciones no farma cológicas que produjeron cambios en la movilidad de la población. El objetivo de este estudio fue relacionar los porcentajes de positividad y la diversidad viral con la movi lidad poblacional durante parte del período de restricciones. Métodos : Estudio retrospectivo analítico realizado en el Instituto Médico Platense durante los años 2020 a 2022 que incluyó 458 pacientes a los que se les tomó un hisopado nasofaríngeo para la búsqueda de patóge nos respiratorios por PCR multiplex. Se analizaron los cambios en la movilidad de la población utilizando los "Informes de Movilidad Local", herramienta desarrollada por Google, cuyos datos son de público acceso. Resultados : La movilidad poblacional se correlacionó significativamente con el porcentaje de positividad de las muestras (p = <0.01; R2 = 0.89) y la diversidad viral (p = 0.04; R2 = 0.78). Discusión : Las intervenciones no farmacológicas destinadas a limitar la propagación del SARS-CoV-2 tuvieron efecto en la circulación de otros virus respi ratorios, hallándose mayor porcentaje de positividad y diversidad a medida que las mismas disminuyeron su grado de restricción.

Abstract Introduction : During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, Ar gentina population suffered from significant changes in population mobility due to non-pharmaceutical interventions. The aim of this study was to describe the impact of the mobility restrictions to the rates of positivity and diversity among different respiratory viruses. Methods : Retrospective analytical study per formed at Instituto Médico Platense in La Plata that included 458 patients with nasopharyngeal swab to search for respiratory pathogens by multiplex PCR. Changes in mobility were studied using "Community Mobility Reports", data set developed by Google and publicly available. Results : Community mobility had significant cor relation with the percentages of viral test positiv ity (p = < 0.01; R2=0.89) and viral diversity (p = 0.04; R2 = 0.78). Discussion : Non-pharmaceutical interventions estab lished to contain SARS-CoV-2 spread had a significant impact in the circulation patterns of other respiratory viruses.

Ceftaroline as salvage therapy for methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus complicated bacteremia / Ceftarolina como tratamiento de rescate para la bacteriemia complicada por Staphylococcus aureus sensible a la meticilina

Abstract Infections caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) are still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment failures of cefazolin (CFZ) have been reported and probably related to the inoculum effect. New treatments for severe MSSA infections are needed and ceftaroline fosamil (CPT) could be an option. Our aim was to describe the clinical characteristics of five patients with com plicated MSSA bacteremia failing CFZ and successfully treated with CPT. We performed a retrospective chart review in a Hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina; in a 12-month period, five patients (24%) of 21 with MSSA bacteremia experienced CFZ failure and were salvaged with CPT. The median time of CFZ therapy was 10 days before changing to CPT; four patients had evidence of metastatic spread and 2 had endocarditis. All patients experienced microbiological and clinical cure with CPT, which was used as monotherapy in 4 and in combination with daptomycin in another. One patient discontinued CPT due to neutropenia on day 23 of treatment. In patients with MSSA BSI failing current therapy, CPT could be a good therapeutic option.

Resumen Las infecciones causadas por Staphylococcus aureus sensible a la meticilina (SASM) todavía se asocian con una morbilidad y mortalidad significativas. Se han informado fallas en el tratamiento de cefazolina (CFZ) probablemente relacionadas con efecto inóculo. Nuevos tratamientos son necesarios para estas infecciones y ceftarolina fosamil (CPT) podría ser una opción. Nuestro objetivo fue describir las características clínicas de cinco pacientes con bacteriemia por SASM complicada con falla a CFZ y que fueron exitosamente tratados con CPT. Realizamos una revisión retrospectiva de historias clínicas en un hospital de Buenos Aires, Argentina; en un período de 12 meses, cinco pacientes (24%) de 21 con bacteriemia por SASM experimentaron falla a CFZ y fueron tratados con CPT. La mediana de tiempo de la terapia con CFZ fue de 10 días antes de cambiar a CPT; cuatro pacientes presentaban evidencia de diseminación metastásica y 2 tenían endocarditis. Todos los pacientes experimen taron curación microbiológica y clínica con CPT, que se utilizó como monoterapia en 4 y en combinación con daptomicina en otro. Un paciente interrumpió CPT debido a neutropenia el día 23 de tratamiento. En enfermos con infecciones graves por SASM que fallan en la terapia actual, CPT podría ser una buena opción terapéutica.

Efficacy, safety, tolerability and population pharmacokinetics of tedizolid, a novel antibiotic, in Latino patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Abstract Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections are caused mainly by Gram-positive bacteria which are often treated with intravenous vancomycin, daptomycin, or linezolid, with potential step down to oral linezolid for outpatients. Tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily treatment for six days demonstrated non-inferior efficacy, with a favourable safety profile, compared with linezolid 600 mg twice daily treatment for 10 days in the Phase 3 ESTABLISH-1 and -2 trials. The objective of the current post-hoc analysis of the integrated dataset of ESTABLISH-1 and -2 was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tedizolid (N = 182) vs linezolid (N = 171) in patients of Latino origin enrolled into these trials. The baseline demographic characteristics of Latino patients were similar between the two treatment groups. Tedizolid demonstrated comparable efficacy to linezolid at 48–72 h in the intent-to-treat population (tedizolid: 80.2% vs linezolid: 81.9%). Sustained clinical success rates were comparable between tedizolid- and linezolid-treated Latino patients at end-of-therapy (tedizolid: 86.8% vs linezolid: 88.9%). Tedizolid phosphate treatment was well tolerated by Latino patients in the safety population with lower abnormal platelet counts at end-of-therapy (tedizolid: 3.4% vs linezolid: 11.3%, p = 0.0120) and lower incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events (tedizolid: 16.5% vs linezolid: 23.5%). Population pharmacokinetic analysis suggested that estimated tedizolid exposure measures in Latino patients vs non-Latino patients were similar. These findings demonstrate that tedizolid phosphate 200 mg, once daily treatment for six days was efficacious and well tolerated by patients of Latino origin, without warranting dose adjustment.